skip to main content
10.1145/3531146.3533212acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfacctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Algorithms Off-limits?: If digital trade law restricts access to source code of software then accountability will suffer

Published:20 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Free trade agreements are increasingly used to construct an additional layer of protection for source code of software. This comes in the shape of a new prohibition for governments to require access to, or transfer of, source code of software, subject to certain exceptions. A clause on software source code is also part and parcel of an ambitious set of new rules on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce currently negotiated by 86 members of the World Trade Organization. Our understanding to date of how such a commitment inside trade law impacts on governments right to regulate digital technologies and the policy space that is allowed under trade law is limited. Access to software source code is for example necessary to meet regulatory and judicial needs in order to ensure that digital technologies are in conformity with individuals’ human rights and societal values. This article will unpack and analyze the implications of such a source code clause for current and future digital policies by governments that aim to ensure transparency, fairness and accountability of computer and machine learning algorithms.

References

  1. Ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI). 2022. Possible elements of a legal framework on artificial intelligence, based on the Council of Europe's standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe Committee of Ministers. CM(2021)173-add. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://rm.coe.int/possible-elements-of-a-legal-framework-on-artificial-intelligence/1680a5ae6bGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Agreement between the United States of America and Japan concerning Digital Trade, signed October 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/japan/Agreement_between_the_United_States_and_Japan_concerning_Digital_Trade.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford. 2018. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society. 20(3):973-989. doi:10.1177/1461444816676645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mike Ananny. 2016. Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness. Science Technology and Human Values. 41(1):93-117. doi:10.1177/0162243915606523Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Andrea Andrenelli, Julien Gourdon and Evdokia Moïsé. 2019. International Technology Transfer Policies. 222 OECD Trade Policy Papers 4. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/7103eabf-en.pdf?itemId=%2Fcontent%2Fpaper%2F7103eabf-en&mimeType=pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Balasz Bodo, 2017. Tackling the Algorithmic Control Crisis – the Technical, Legal, and Ethical Challenges of Research into Algorithmic Agents, The Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 19(1), pp. 133–180. Retrieved January 19, 2022 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7813Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenna Burrell. 2016. How the Machine “Thinks”: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data and Society. 3(1). (January 2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mira Burri and Rodrigo Polanco. 2020. Digital Trade Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Dataset. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(1). (March 2020). pp. 187–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam, March 2018. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from http://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/tpp-11-treaty-text.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Data Ethics Commission. 2019. Opinion of the Data Ethics Commission. Berlin. December 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://datenethikkommission.de/wp-content/uploads/DEK_Gutachten_engl_bf_200121.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicholas Diakopoulos, 2016. Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 59 No. 2. (February 2016), pp. 56-62. doi: 10.1145/2844110 62Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cosmina Dorobantu, Florian Ostmann and Christina Hitrova1. 2021. Source code disclosure : A primer for trade negotiators, in Borcher, I. and Winters, L. A. (eds) Addressing Impediments to Digital Trade. London: CEPR Press. doi: 978-1-912179-42-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ronald Dworkin. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), signed July 2018 and into force since February 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1684Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. EU-Mexico Agreement in principle, announced on 21 April 2018 (pending ratification). Retrieved January 19, 2022 from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/156811.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission. 2021. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. COM/2021/206 final. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission. 2021. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC. COM(2020) 825. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/proposal_for_a_regulation_on_a_single_market_for_digital_services.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Michèle Finck. 2020. Legal analysis of international trade law and digital trade (PE 603.517), briefing requested by the INTA Committee. Brussels. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/18173e33-2954-11eb-9d7e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-172804686Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Megan Geuss, 2017. A Year of Digging through Code Yields “Smoking Gun” on VW, Fiat Diesel Cheats. Ars Technica. 28 May 2017. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://arstechnica.com/cars/2017/05/volkswagen-bosch-fiat-diesel-emissions-cheats-cracked-open-in-new-research/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Benjamin Haibe-Kains, George Alexandru Adam, Ahmed Hosny, 2020. Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence. Nature 586, E14–E16. (October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2766-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kristina Irion. 2021. AI Regulation in the European Union and Trade Law: How Can Accountability of AI and a High Level of Consumer Protection Prevail over a Trade Discipline on Source Code?, Study commission by the German Federation of Consumer Protection Organizations (vzbv). Amsterdam. Institute for Information Law. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3786567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Deborah James. 2020. Digital Trade Rules: a Disastrous New Constitution for the Global Economy, by and for Big Tech. Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. Brussels. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://cepr.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/digital-trade-2020-07.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Burcu Kilic and Renata Avila. 2020. Opening Spaces for Digital Rights Activism: Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Philadelphia. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/Trade-Report_IPO-1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rob Kitchin. 2017. Thinking critically about and researching algorithms, Information, Communication & Society, 20:1, 14-29. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ansgar Koene. 2018. Some Implications of WTO Ecommerce Proposals Restricting Access to Algorithms on Algorithmic Transparency. Paper Presented at the WTO Public Forum, 2-4 October 2018. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://ourworldisnotforsale.net/2018/Koene_algorithms.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society, (December 2016). doi: 10.1177/2053951716679679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. OECD. 2019. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). Adopted by the OECD Council on 22 May 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Oxford English Dictionary. “source code”. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/185182?redirectedFrom=%22source+code%22#eid21845861Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shin-yi Peng, Ching-Fu Lin, and Thomas Streinz. 2021. Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: A Research and Policy Agenda. Chapter. In Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration, edited by Shin-yi Peng, Ching-Fu Lin, and Thomas Streinz, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. doi:10.1017/9781108954006.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement between Australia, Brunei, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, signed in November 2020 and entered into force in January 2022. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanya Reid Smith. 2017. Preliminary analysis of aspects of some WTO ecommerce proposals – MC11 briefing paper. Third World Network, 10 December 2017. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://ourworldisnotforsale.net/2017/TWN_E-commerce.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Bernhard Rieder and Jeanette Hofmann. 2020. Towards platform observability. Internet Policy Review, 9(4). (December 2020). doi: 10.14763/2020.4.1535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Dennis Rodrik. 2020. What do trade agreements really do?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), pp. 73–90. doi: 10.1257/jep.32.2.73Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Christian Sandvig 2014. Auditing Algorithms, in ICA 2014 Data and Discrimination Preconference. ICA, pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1109/DEXA.2009.55Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kevin Scott. 2020. Microsoft teams up with OpenAI to exclusively license GPT-3 language model. Official Microsoft Blog, September 22, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2020/09/22/microsoft-teams-up-with-openai-to-exclusively-license-gpt-3-language-model/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Alan O. Sykes. 2021. The Law and Economics of “Forced” Technology Transfer and Its Implications for Trade and Investment Policy (and the U.S.–China Trade War). Journal of Legal Analysis. 13(1). (March 2021). pp. 127–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part (TCA), signed on 30 December 2020, applied provisionally as of 1 January 2021 and entered into force on 1 May 2021. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2021/689(1)/ojGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. UNCTAD. 2021. What is at Stake for Developing Countries in Trade Negotiations on E-commerce? The Case of the Joint Statement Initiative. New York. United Nations. doi: 10.18356/9789210056366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), November 2018. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/USMCA/Text/19-Digital-Trade.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Briana Vecchione, Karen Levy, and Solon Barocas. 2021. Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465416.3483294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (with annex), concluded on 23 May 1969. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-1155-i-18232-english.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wikipedia. “history of source code”. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_programming_languagesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. WTO. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Annex 1C to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, signed in Marrakesh. Morocco on 15 April 1994. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. WTO, Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce (WT/L/1056), Geneva, 25 January 2019. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/DDFDocuments/251086/q/WT/L/1056.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. WTO, Joint Statement Initiative on E-commerce: Statement by Ministers of Australia, Japan and Singapore, Geneva, 1 December 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2022 from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/ji_ecom_minister_statement_e.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. WTO plurilateral ecommerce draft consolidated text. Unofficial leaked document. August 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2022 https://www.bilaterals.org/IMG/pdf/wto_plurilateral_ecommerce_draft_consolidated_text.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Algorithms Off-limits?: If digital trade law restricts access to source code of software then accountability will suffer
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format